Nudibranch molluscs ( Sea-slugs ) of the Yorkshire Coast & Central North Sea, by D. E. Whittaker

The nudibranchs belong to that great division of animals known as the Mollusca, which includes the snails, slugs, clams, chitons, limpets, octopus and squid. The bodies of the nudibranchs are without a shell, and the gills, variously carried as veils, branched excresences or plumes on the different species, are therefore totally unprotected, hence the name of the group, the Nudibranchiata, or ‘naked gilled’ molluscs. Popularly known as sea-slugs, many of these delicate creatures are among the most beautiful and colourful sea-creatures of the British Isles, while tropical species are even more spectacular.

Most British species are small and require careful and laborious searching under boulders on the sea-shore, or among the mass of hydroids and weed brought up in trawl nets. The number of species confirmed as occurring on the Yorkshire Coast is comprehensive, although several other species that are undoubtedly present in the area have so far evaded observation, due to the difficulties of sampling these molluscs. There have been few workers of this group on this coast, and historical records are few and principally the work of Dr. Irving, who worked the rock pools at Scarborough during the first decades of the twentieth century, while Dr Chris Todd worked the group while a student at the now defunct Wellcome Marine Laboratory of Leeds University at Robin Hood’s Bay in the mid 1970’s. The present author’s records began during shore work in the early 1960s, extending to include offshore material later in the decade. Of particular interest are the accruing records of the occurrence of nudibranchs in the stomachs of local fishes.

Reference material in the Archive consists of preserved specimens and photographic records, but close-up video is now being used to record the animals in situ when found.

Confirmed Yorkshire & Central North Sea species

Order NUDIBRANCHIA

Sub-order DORIDINA ( nudibranchs with a rosette of gills towards the posterior end of their bodies, and which surround the anus.)

Family Goniodoridae

Pelgella castanea (Alder & Hancock, 1845)

Okenia aspersa (Alder & Hancock, 1845)

Okenia elegans (Leuckart,1828)

Okenia leachii (Alder & Hancock, 1854)

Okenia nodosa (Montagu,1808)

Ancula gibbosa (Alder, 1841)

Family Onchidorididae

Onchidoris bilamelllata (Linnaeus, 1767)

Onchidoris muricata (O.F. Muller, 1776)

Atalodoris depressa (Alder & Hancock, 1842)

Atalodoris sparsa (Alder & Hancock, 1846)

Atalodoris inconspicua (Alder & Hancock, 1851)

Atalodoris pusilla (Alder & Hancock, 1845)

Diaphorodoris luteocincta (M. Sars, 1870)

Acanthodoris pilosa (Abildgaard, 1789)

Adalaria proxima (Alder & Hancock, 1854)

Family Aegiretidae

Aegires punctilucens (Orbigny, 1837)

Family Polyceridae

Polycera faeroensis Lemche, 1929

Polycera quadrilineata (O.F. Muller, 1776)

Polycera norvegica Sorensen, Rauch, Pola & Malaquias, 2020

Limacea clavigera (O.F. Muller, 1776)

Palio dubia (M. Sars, 1829)

Palio nothus (Johnston, 1838)

Family Chromodoridae

Cadlina laevis (Linnaeus, 1767)

Family Rostangidae

Rostanga rubra (Risso, 1818)

Family Dorididae

Doris pseudoargus (Rapp, 1827)

Family Discodorididae

Geitodoris planata (Alder & Hancock, 1846)

Family Kentrodoridae

Jorunna tomentosa (Cuvier, 1804)

Jorunna artsdatabankia Neuhaus, Rauch,Bakken,Picton,Pola & Malaquias, 2021

Sub-Order Cladobranchia

Family Arminidae

Armina loveni (Bergh, 1860)

Family Janolidae

Janolus hyalinus (Alder & Hancock, 1854)

Family Heroidae

Hero formosa (Loven, 1841)

Family Tritonidae

Tritonia hombergi Cuvier, 1803

Candiella lineata Alder & Hancock 1848

Candiella plebeia Johnston, 1828

Family Lomanotidae

Lomanotus genei Verany, 1846

Lomanotus marmoratus (Alder & Hancock, 1845)

Family Scyllaeidae

Scyllaea pelagica Linnaeus, 1758

Family Dendronotidae

Dendronotus frondosus (Ascanius, 1774)

Dendronotus lacteus Thompson, 1840

Dendronotus europaeus Korshunova,Martynov, Bakken & Picton, 2017

Family Dotidae

Doto coronata (Gmelin, 1791)

Doto cuspidata Alder & Hancock, 1862

Doto dunnei Lemche, 1976

Doto fragilis (Forbes, 1838)

Doto hydrallmaniae Morrow,Thorpe & Picton, 1992

Doto koenneckeri Lemche, 1976

Doto pinnatifida (Montagu, 1804)

Doto tuberculata Lemche 1976

Doto millbayana Lemche, 1976

Family Embletoniidae

Embletonia pulchra (Alder & Hancock, 1844)

Family Flabellinidae

Carronella pellucida

Fjordia browni Picton, 1980

Fjordia lineata (Loven, 1846)

Edmundsella pedata (Montagu, 1815)

Microchlamylla gracilis (Alder & Hancock, 1844)

Family Coryphellidae

Coryphella verrucosa (M. Sars, 1829)

Family Tergipedidae

Tergipes tergipes (Forsskal, 1775)

Family Fionidae

Rubramoena amoena (Alder & Hancock, 1845)

Rubramoena rubescens (Picton & Brown 1978)

Cuthonella concinna (Alder & Hancock, 1843)

Family Trinchesidae

Catriona aurantia (Couthony, 1838)

Trinchesia caerulea (Montagu, 1804)

Trinchesia cuanensis Korshunova, Picton, Furfaro, Mariottini, Pontes, Prkic, Fletcher, Malmberg, Lundin & Martynov, 2019

Trinchesia foliata (Forbes & Goodsir, 1839)

Diaphoreolis viridis (Forbes, 1840)

Zelentia pustulata (Alder & Hancock, 1854)

Tenellia adspersa Nordmann, 1845)

Family Eubranchidae

Eubranchus exiguus (Alder & Hancock, 1848)

Eubranchus tricolor Forbes, 1838

Amphorina ferrani (Alder & Hancock, 1844)

Amphorina pallida (Alder & Hancock, 1842)

Family Facellinidae

Facelina auriculata (O.F. Muller, 1776)

Facelina bostoniensis (Couthony, 1838)

Family Favourinidae

Favourinus branchialis (Rathke, 1806)

Family Aeolidiidae

Aeolidia filomenae Kjenberger,Carmona, Pola, Padula, Gosliner & Cervera, 2016

Aeolidia papillosa (Linnaeus, 1761)

Aelidiella glauca (Alder & Hancock, 1854

Aeolidiella alderi (Cocks, 1852)

Nudibranchs as the prey of Fishes on the Yorkshire Coast

Lacking a shell, the soft bodied nudibranchs utilse a number of defensive mechanisms to avoid predation, including the storage and deployment of stinging cells, derived from the tissues of the anemones and hydroids they devour, the use of calcareous spicules embedded in the surface tissues, and the production of acidic and mucous secretions from special glands, while many species are also thought to exhibit warning colouration. Many others are cryptically coloured, marked, or sculpted and become very difficult to determine in their particular habitat; Aegires punctiluscens, for example, is extremely difficult to detect and its presence is often only revealed by the egg masses they have deposited nearby.

Nudibranchs are sometimes attacked and eaten by the pycnogonids, or sea-spiders, that frequent the hydroids upon which many nudibranchs also prey. However, it is invariably stated that nudibranchs are not eaten by fishes, because of their supposed unpalatability due to the various defence mechanisms listed above. Experiments on the feeding of nudibranchs to fishes at the Plymouth laboratory early in the 20th century are frequently cited as evidence to this view, further supported by the absence of reports of their discovery in the stomachs of fishes.

Observations on the Yorkshire coast, however, show that certain fishes regularly devour nudibranchs, sometimes in large numbers.

The black sea bream, Spondyliosoma cantharus, the most commonly found spariid in the North sea, is an occasional trawl catch on the Yorkshire coast. Stomach contents of Yorkshire examples of this fish were examined by simple visual inspection until 1974, when an almost intact specimen of the nudibranch Eubranchus tricolor was found as a prey item in a young fish. It was realised that had the mollusc been in a more advanced state of digestion, or considerably smaller, it would not have been recognised as a nudibranch or perhaps, even as a mollusc, by the naked eye. Had the mollusc been completely digested, the tiny radula and jaws would have gone entirely unnoticed, and thus the presence of nudibranchs as prey items in previous Yorkshire catches of Spondyliosoma had been overlooked. Dating from this occurrence, all Spondyliosoma samples have therefore been critically examined under the microscope. It was also apparent that this prey item would not have been recognised by anyone unfamiliar with living or preserved members of the group.

These factors therefore underlie the difficulties of recognising and identifying the remains of nudibranchs in fish stomachs,and which has assisted the prevailing view that as a group they are unpredated by fishes. It should be further realised that the majority of fisheries biologists conducting stomach analyses have no familiarity of the nudibranchiata, the majority of which are of small size, nor is it regular practice to laboriously examine the finer detritus of the stomachs of demersal fish, unless conducting parasitological studies, and which is essential for the detection of nudibranch radulae and jaws.

Further examinations of Spondyliosoma caught in this sea area have revealed a number of species of nudibranch are eaten, including one fish being gorged upon several species, belonging to several families, to the exclusion of other types of prey.

Large specimens of Aeolidia, recently devoured, have been found in the cod, while the even larger Tritonia hombergi, a common mollusc on the local trawling grounds, is frequently eaten by both cod and haddock along the Yorkshire coast, the large, unmistakable jaws being easily seen by the naked eye; this sea-slug has of course long been known to be devoured by Scyliorhinus caniculus, the lesser spotted dogfish, elsewhere in the British Isles, though the stomach contents of the Yorkshire population of this fish have not been investigated.

The haddock devours a wide range of benthic animals on the Yorkshire grounds, including many molluscs, and in particular large numbers of the opisthobranchs Pleurobranchus, Cylichna, Retusa and Philine, but in the summer of 2005 was also discovered to be predating large numbers of nudibranchs, easily recognised from the many partially digested remains as being facellinids, at a particular off-shore locality. A small sample of gut detritus from this catch of haddock, examined microscopcally, further revealed many hundreds of facellinid jaws and radulae, indicating not just the large scale cropping of the molluscs by the haddock, but also the huge numbers of these nudibranchs present on the sea bed at this particular locality at that season.

Related topics